lai
Jobber
Posts: 4
|
Post by lai on Nov 29, 2006 0:53:50 GMT -5
i was trying to make a deck out of dude love and its superstar ability says that it can contain up to 3 cactus jack superstar cards but these cards are blank...
so what i wanna know is whether;
1) i can use maneuvers of cactus jack superstar specific cards to attack without the need of the cards titiled split personalities have benefits.. eg.i wanna use tree of woe( text: cannot be reversed and when successfully played, opponent must discard 2 cards) do i have to use the card split personalities have benefits..to play it or i could just play it as any other maneuver...
2)i could use bang!bang! to reverse opponent's maneuvers...coz as wad dude love ability says that the cactus jack card will have a blank text which means it is just a card without any effect...
|
|
lai
Jobber
Posts: 4
|
Post by lai on Nov 29, 2006 1:02:31 GMT -5
another thing is that can i use 2 tree of woe coz there r two types one refers to dude love only while the other refers to mankind and cactus jack and again does the card reffering to mankind and cactus jack only have damage without it having any text...
|
|
|
Post by Daeva on Nov 29, 2006 1:32:45 GMT -5
The bit about Mankind and Cactus Jack Superstar cards does not refer to Mankind and Cactus Jack Superstar-specific cards (like Bang! Bang! or Mandible Claw), it refers to the literal Mankind and Cactus Jack Superstar cards, with the hand size and Superstar value. Packing them only lets you search them out via Split Personalities and overlay them on top of your Dude Love Superstar card. Dude Love cannot pack Superstar-specific cards with other logos that aren't the Mankind or Cactus Jack Superstar card (with the hand size and Superstar value), so you can't chuck Bang! Bang! or Mr. Socko into your Dude Love deck.
As for Tree of Woe, it has been errataed to have the Mankind, Cactus Jack, and Dude Love logos, so you can pack any version of Tree, but only one, since it is a Unique card.
|
|
lai
Jobber
Posts: 4
|
Post by lai on Nov 29, 2006 2:46:33 GMT -5
oh now i get it thank you very much daeva
|
|